Home
About Us
News
Richard's Blog
Cheshunt Central Ward
Cheshunt North Ward
What We Cost You
Committees We Serve On
Meetings We Attend
Events
Contact Us
Links
Tell A Friend

Richard's Blog

RSS Feed rss

Posted on Monday Aug 31 9:50:00 BST 2009
I should have done some more research............
 
Apparently all incandescent bulbs are to be "phased out", that is to say banned, by 2011.
 
Posted on Monday Aug 31 9:45:00 BST 2009
OK - I know this is a strange title for a blog post but bear with me.................
 
From tomorrow an old friend, the 100w light bulb, falls foul of EU legislation, and is to be banned - or at least the manufacturing and import of them is to cease, which amounts to the pretty much the same thing.
 
All sorts of good reasons are given for this measure.
 
The "energy saving" alternatives we are now obliged to use are apparently more carbon friendly (whatever that means) and are cheaper to run.
 
Hoorah - we can now save a few coppers a year on our electricity bills and not worry that we are killing polar bears when we turn the light on.
 
Never mind that the "energy saving" bulbs give out poor light, take time to "warm up", are apparently full of unpleasant metals that are a bugger to dispose of safely and most importantly are accused of unpleasant side effects for migraine sufferers, people with light sensitivity and people with certain skin conditions.
 
Now, I don't care if people want to use energy saving bulbs, 100w bulbs or any other type of light bulb - it's a matter of personal choice and that is precisely the issue here.
 
The EU is now imposing it's will on the British people in more and more insidious ways - when we decided to join the Common Market back in the 1970's did we ever dream that 35 years later some faceless Eurocrats would dictate what we put into our light fittings?
 
Wonder how long before other old type incandescent light bulbs are condemned?
 
Watch out 60w light bulb - your days are numbered...............
Posted on Wednesday Aug 26 13:55:00 BST 2009

Now that the dust has settled on Sunday’s Ashes victory I can’t resist posting a few of my thoughts on the series.

 

I may have commented before that test cricket is a peculiar game, a point well illustrated when one looks at the individual performance statistics for the series.

 

In virtually every aspect the Australians performed better as individuals than their English counterparts – more 100’s, more wickets, higher batting averages etc.

 

Yet they lost!

 

England won the series on the strength of a small number of outstanding individual performances in key sessions – Flintoff’s bowling at Lords, Strauss & Cook’s opening partnership in the same match, Broad’s spell on Friday afternoon at the Oval and of course Collingwood, Anderson and Panesar holding out for the draw at Cardiff.

 

The teams in this series are certainly much weaker than those in the 2005 series – Australia simply haven’t yet found replacements for Warne, Gilchrist, Langer, Hayden and McGrath and the current English team is missing the likes of Vaughan, Trescothick and Simon Jones.

 

This hasn’t detracted from the enjoyment of watching the matches but in the historical context the 2009 series probably won’t be remembered as a contest between 2 good teams.
 
It reminded me of the 1985 series when 2 relatively weak teams contested a 6 match series that England won 3-1.

 

I thought that Ricky Ponting, the Australian captain, was extremely gracious in defeat and I hope that he decides to continue in post, or at least in test cricket, for many more years.
 
He is one of the outstanding batsmen of the modern era whose wicket is greatly prized by his opponents (remember the crowd’s relief when he was run out on Sunday afternoon.)

 

Kind of sad to see Flintoff retire from the 5 day game – he is certainly a player who has contributed greatly to English cricket, has won some key matches by his performances and is a superb entertainer.

 

However, in a sense I feel that Flintoff will be remembered as an underperformer at the highest level of the game.
 
He has a huge amount of talent but he hasn’t produced enough 100’s or “5 fors” to be considered as one of the great all-rounder players like Sobers, Imran, Botham or Hadlee.

 

There was some dreadful rubbish on the front page of a tabloid red top on Monday suggesting Flintoff should be knighted – sorry but he just hasn’t contributed enough for this honour.

 

In my opinion a very good but not a great player

 

In 18 months time it all starts again in Australia – hopefully with a better result than the last time England went down under.

Posted on Wednesday Aug 26 13:00:00 BST 2009
I haven't had much time to post this week - busy with the "day job" - so will try to catch up in the next day or so.
 
I thought this article in Monday's "Torygraph" is well worth a read - if only for the comment:
 
"The chief consequence of setting up the Holyrood parliament has been that 129 Scottish villages are missing their idiots"
 
I guess the same line can be applied to just about any elected body but it did make me smile...............
Posted on Sunday Aug 23 10:00:00 BST 2009
I don't usually look at the News of the World's website (no interest in Z list "celebrities") so I missed this story.
 
Not so very long ago the Defence Secretary, Bob Ainsworth, had to tell his junior ministers not to smear General Richard Dannart.
 
This must have been difficult for the recently promoted Kevan Jones MP who as a backbencher had been doing his best to "dig the dirt" on the General.
 
The General is likely to be a thorn in New Labour's side after he retires and one suspects that Mr Jones and his ilk have been doing their best to "get their retaliation in first".
 
If the News of the World is right, the General has been just as prudent in managing his expenses budget as he has been effective as the army chief of staff.
 
I don't know what the Generals political views are (but I could perhaps guess) - but isn't he just the sort of person we need in British politics?
 
Richard Dannart is true expert in his field, a man of personal courage who appears to be untainted by scandal - what a contrast to so many of our grubby national politicians.
 

newer posts | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | older posts

 



 

Powered by Create