I have appreciated the speeches advocating reductions in the cost of politics made by David Cameron and George Osborne this week.
Although I would like Cameron to have gone further than a proposed 10% cut in MP's (585 is far too many – I would go for 500) I see this as being a good policy that will find favour with the electorate.
Equally plans to reduce the number of ministerial posts have to be correct – if for no other reason that if the overall number of MP's is to fall then so, logically, should the number of ministers (Is there something about numbers of Chiefs and Indians here?)
The other measures announced by Cameron should also be well received – even thought the potential financial savings are small (£120 million).
Any plan that tries to pull the inhabitants of the “Westminster Village” back into the real world simply has to be right.
The LibDems made a cheap shot that they would save money by scrapping Trident (albeit a policy I am fairly comfortable with) whereas Cameron was talking about the cost of salads………….
This totally missed the point of Cameron's speech which was about leadership and specifically the need for our political leaders to show a good example in these financially troubled times.
Clearly in the run up to the General Election there will be a need for the Conservatives to spell out just how they are going to put the nation's finances back into order if elected.
Inevitably this will involve making some tough decisions and give New Labour the opportunity to spout off about “Tory Cuts”. (As if they wouldn't make cuts as well)
This seems to be an attempt to invoke a folk memory from the early 1980's – another occasion when a new Tory government had to pull Britain out of the financial mire that Labour had created.
As such it should be seen as a desperate attempt to frighten the electorate from a party that is now devoid of ideas and discredited by it's mismanagement of the British economy.
Thinking about where government spending can be reduced.
Cameron should withdraw the “ring fence” around the budget for International Development.
I am uncomfortable that so much of this well intentioned funding simply ends up in the numbered Swiss bank accounts of the ruling cliques of many “developing countries” or is paying for the unaccountable and unelected quango's that determine where the budget is allocated / spent.
In these difficult times no government spending should be excluded from possible budget reductions.